- Hindi news
- National
- Nishikant dubey; President vs Supreme Court Power | Judiciary jp nadda bjp
New Delhi13 minutes ago
- Copy link
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey said that, now when Parliament sits, this issue will be raised.
The dispute of setting a time limit for the Supreme Court to take a decision on the Bills of the President is increasing. BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has objected to this after Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar. The MP said that the President is appointed as the Chief Justice of India. In such a situation, how can you (CJI) give instructions to an appointing authority.
He said, ‘Parliament enacts the law of this country. Will you instruct that Parliament? Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna is responsible for the civil war in the country. The Supreme Court is responsible for inciting religious war.
He said- The court is going out of its limits. If everyone has to go to the Supreme Court for all matters, then Parliament and Assembly should be closed.
At the same time, BJP has opted out of Nishikant’s statement. The party’s national president JP Nadda said- Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma have nothing to do with the statement made on the judiciary and the Chief Justice of the country. This is his personal statement.
Actually, this matter was raised from the dispute between the Tamil Nadu Governor and the State Government. The Supreme Court on 8 April ordered that the Governor has no veto power. At the same time, the President will have to take a decision on the bill within 3 months. The order came to light on 11 April.
Nishikant questioned Supreme Court on Section 377, IT Act and temple-mosque dispute
Article 377: An article was 377, in which homosexuality was a crime. In America, the Trump government said that there are only two sexes in the world, one man, the other- female. The third has no place. All religions, whether Hindu, Muslim, Jain, Sikh, Christian. Everyone believes that homosexuality is a crime. The Supreme Court wakes up one morning. They say that we end this article. We created an IT Act. Under which work was done to curb porn of women and children. One day the Supreme Court says that they are ending the 66A IT Act.
Article 141: I have studied Article 141. This article says that the law we make applicable from lower court to the Supreme Court. Article 368 states that the Parliament of this country has the right to enact a law and the Supreme Court has the right to explain it.
Temple-Masjid dispute: There has been a tradition of Sanatan in our country. There is a tradition of millions of years. When the subject of Ram temple comes, you say that show the paper. If the matter of Krishna Janmabhoomi comes, then you will say that show the paper. The same thing will be said in the case of knowledge. Only and only the Supreme Court is responsible for inciting religious war in this country.
BJP does not support such statements
Nadda wrote in X post- The BJP neither keeps any coincidence with such statements nor does it ever support such statements. The BJP dismisses these statements outright. The party has always respected the judiciary, gladly accepted their orders and suggestions, as we believe that all the courts of the country including the Supreme Court are integral to our democracy. There is a strong foundation for the protection of the Constitution. I have directed both of them and everyone not to make such statements.
Opposition and former judge reaction to Nishikant’s statement
- Congress MP Jairam Ramesh Said, the Supreme Court is being intentionally targeted because on many issues like electoral bonds, the Supreme Court has said that what the government has done is unconstitutional.
- Congress leader Salman Khurshid Said, if an MP questions the Supreme Court or any court, it is very sad. The final decision in our judicial system is not of the government but of the Supreme Court. If anyone does not understand this, then it is very sad.
- You spokes Priyanka Kakkar Said, “He (Nishikant Dubey) has given a very poor statement. I hope that tomorrow the Supreme Court will start contempt proceedings by taking automatic cognizance against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey tomorrow and will send him to jail.
- Supreme Court Former judge Ashok Kumar Ganguly Said, according to Article 53 of the Constitution, the President should work according to the Constitution, if it is not, then the Supreme Court can direct the President. There is nothing wrong in this. Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar needs to understand that no one is above the law.
What has happened on the dispute so far…
17 April: Dhankhar said- courts cannot order the President
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar was addressing a group of Rajya Sabha intern on 17 April. During this time, he objected to the advice of the Supreme Court, in which the President and the governors had set a deadline for approving the bills.
Dhankhar had said- “The courts cannot order the President. The special rights under Article 142 of the Constitution have become 24×7 available nuclear missile against democratic powers. Judges are acting as a super parliamentary.” Read full news …
April 18: Sibal said- President nominal head in India
Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal said that when the executive does not work, the judiciary will have to intervene. The President is the head of the nominal head in India. The President-Governor has to work on the advice of governments. I am surprised to hear the Vice President, I am also sad. They should not talk to any party.
Referring to a decision of the Supreme Court on 24 June 1975, Sibal said- ‘People will remember when the decision on Indira Gandhi’s election came, only one judge, Justice Krishna Iyer ruled. At that time Indira had to lose Sansadi. Then Dhankhar ji approved this. But now the decision of the two -judge bench against the government is being questioned. Read full news …
8 April: Controversy started with this decision of Supreme Court
The Supreme Court had set the limit of the authority of the Governor in the case of the Tamil Nadu Governor and the State Government on 8 April. The bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan had said, “The Governor has no veto power.” The Supreme Court also termed the government’s 10 essential bills being stopped by the Governor as illegal.
During this decision, the court also clarified the situation on the bill sent by the Governors to the President. The Supreme Court had said that the President would have to take a decision on the bill sent by the Governor within 3 months. The order was made public on 11 April. Read full news …
Read this news too …
President of India lives in 350 -room palace: 9 tennis court, 11 crore car
Rashtrapati Bhavan, located on the western bank of Rajpath on Raisina Hill in New Delhi, is spread over 330 acres. How big it is can be gauged from the fact that the total length of the corridors of the building is 2.5 kilometers. Rashtrapati Bhavan has 9 tennis courts, a polo ground, golf grounds and a beautiful Mughal garden. Read full news …
Leave a Reply