Ramesh Kumar, whose Income Family ID was shown ₹ 1.20 billion.
A laborer from Mahendragarh got trapped in the family ID game in Haryana. In which the Saral Center filled the laborer’s annual earnings of 1.20 billion. After this, government officials made his income 10 lakh annually after double verification. He did not even see the workers’ profession.
,
After this, all the banners received by the laborer were closed. On finding out this, the troubled laborers reached the DC’s solution camp. Where he said that my earning is 80 thousand annually. Therefore, income should be corrected in the family ID, so that I can get the benefit of government schemes.

Ramesh Kumar’s house, which has 2 rooms. Ramesh lives here with mother and wife.
Know the whole matter in a sequential manner
When the laborer reached the Samadhan Camp, it was revealed Ramesh Kumar, a resident of Jonavas village in Mahendragarh, reached DC’s resolution camp with an application. Ramesh said that its annual income in the Family ID i.e. Family ID (PPP) has been reduced to 1.20 billion. This is wrong. His annual income is only 80 thousand rupees. His income should be fixed.
Know how the laborer’s income was 1.20 billion, know in 3 points
1. The annual income of the family was up to 1 lakh rupees Ramesh told that he had earlier created a family ID. In which the annual income of his family was up to Rs 1 lakh. Because of this, he was getting other banners, including ration below the poverty line i.e. 1.80 lakh annual income.

Ramesh told that the income was up to 1 lakh when earlier a family ID was created.
2. The work of the Mazdoor Sangh went to the simple center Ramesh further explained that in November – December, he went to the Saral Center to get the money of the Mazdoor Union. There are 13 thousand rupees in 5 years. Going there, he filled the form for the Mazdoor Union. During this time an OTP came to him. Which he told to the operator of the simple center. After this, from the month of January, he stopped getting government benefits below the poverty line. He stopped getting ration.
3. Annual income was tampered with Ramesh said that when he asked about this, he was told that his income is more than 1.80 lakhs below the poverty line. Because of this, the government stopped giving benefits. Ramesh expressed suspicion that income was tampered with in his family ID at the simple center itself. Apart from this, he did not fill any form anywhere nor gave anyone an OTP to open a family ID. It was here that his income was filled 1.20 billion.
Government reduced to 10 lakhs, double verification also false claims Surprisingly in this case, who crossed Ramesh’s income, did not find out anything on the ground. Ramesh’s family ID shows that his 1.20 billion income was reduced to 10 lakh or more annually. It was also claimed that Ramesh’s family income is more than 1.80 lakh, it has also been checked by the local committee and the sector committee.

In Ramesh’s family ID, the income in Ramesh’s family ID was reduced from 1.20 billion to 10 lakh or more annually.
ADC will be fine only then it will be fine In this case, an employee of the Saral Center said that the government has not given the right to connect and reduce anything in the family ID. All this work is done at the simple center itself. In this case, now the laborer will have to take approval from ADC. Only after permission from there, income will be cured in the family ID through the simple center.
City Magistrate (CTM) Manjeet Kumar, Narnaul, who reached the Samadhan Camp, said that the applications will be rectified by sending an application in this regard.
Woman’s age has shown 125 in Narnaul A case of disturbances came to light at the age of a woman in Narnaul. In the family ID, officials have shown the age of a 58 -year -old woman to 125 years. At the same time, her husband’s age has been recorded at 60 years. Shyam Sundar, a resident of Mohalla Khadkhari in Narnaul, said that he was born on 17 May 1965, according to which he is 60 years old. But the age of his wife has been recorded at 125 years, in which the wife’s birth is shown on 1 January 1900. To fix this mistake, they have to visit the officials.
Leave a Reply